Introduction: Gender differences in eating habits and protein consumption patterns are determined by cultural, socio-economic, and behavioural factors. Men tend to consume more meat, while women prefer plant-based proteins; however, the impact of these choices on body composition remains unclear. Objectives: This study explores gender differences in protein consumption and the influence of socioeconomic status on dietary choices, evaluating their potential association with body composition parameters, including fat mass (FM%) and fat-free mass (FFM%). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1708 Italian adults (721 males, 987 females). Food intake was assessed using a validated 7-day food diary. Participants were classified as non-consumers, low consumers, or high consumers according to the median intake of each protein source. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Results: Meat and processed meat consumption was significantly higher in men (p < 0.001), while women consumed more soy (p = 0.0087). Individuals with high meat and processed meat consumption had a higher BMI (p < 0.01), whereas soy consumption was associated with a lower BMI (p = 0.0027). Socioeconomic status influenced food choices: low-income men consumed more meat and processed meat compared to higher-income groups (p < 0.01), while differences in fish consumption were mainly observed in low-income groups. Conclusions: Gender differences in protein consumption persist across socioeconomic levels and are related to body composition. Meat consumption is culturally linked to masculinity, whereas plant-based proteins are more commonly consumed by women. Understanding these dietary patterns can inform targeted nutritional interventions that promote balanced and sustainable diets.

Gender Differences in Protein Consumption and Body Composition: The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Dietary Choices

Mauro Lombardo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Gender differences in eating habits and protein consumption patterns are determined by cultural, socio-economic, and behavioural factors. Men tend to consume more meat, while women prefer plant-based proteins; however, the impact of these choices on body composition remains unclear. Objectives: This study explores gender differences in protein consumption and the influence of socioeconomic status on dietary choices, evaluating their potential association with body composition parameters, including fat mass (FM%) and fat-free mass (FFM%). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1708 Italian adults (721 males, 987 females). Food intake was assessed using a validated 7-day food diary. Participants were classified as non-consumers, low consumers, or high consumers according to the median intake of each protein source. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Results: Meat and processed meat consumption was significantly higher in men (p < 0.001), while women consumed more soy (p = 0.0087). Individuals with high meat and processed meat consumption had a higher BMI (p < 0.01), whereas soy consumption was associated with a lower BMI (p = 0.0027). Socioeconomic status influenced food choices: low-income men consumed more meat and processed meat compared to higher-income groups (p < 0.01), while differences in fish consumption were mainly observed in low-income groups. Conclusions: Gender differences in protein consumption persist across socioeconomic levels and are related to body composition. Meat consumption is culturally linked to masculinity, whereas plant-based proteins are more commonly consumed by women. Understanding these dietary patterns can inform targeted nutritional interventions that promote balanced and sustainable diets.
2025
gender differences
protein consumption
body composition
fat mass
fat-free mass
socioeconomic status
dietary habits
meat intake
plant-based proteins
nutritional epidemiology
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12078/27266
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact