The essay aims at analysing the scope of Article 48, par. 3, Code of Administrative trial stating that where the opposition is inadmissible, the Regional Administrative Court ar-ranges the return of the documents relating to the case for the continuation of proceedings in extraordinary session. Taking into consideration the reference to inadmissibility, the le-gal question that rises is if this rule applies also in the case the opposition is filed after the expiration of the legal deadline. In this respect, the analysis is carried out by way a sys-tematic approach, taking into consideration the definition of inadmissibility from a pro-cessual point of view and the nature and legal features of the opposition act.
Contributo sull’art. 48, comma 3, c.p.a. e sindacato del Giudice amministrativo
Giuseppe La Rosa
2023-01-01
Abstract
The essay aims at analysing the scope of Article 48, par. 3, Code of Administrative trial stating that where the opposition is inadmissible, the Regional Administrative Court ar-ranges the return of the documents relating to the case for the continuation of proceedings in extraordinary session. Taking into consideration the reference to inadmissibility, the le-gal question that rises is if this rule applies also in the case the opposition is filed after the expiration of the legal deadline. In this respect, the analysis is carried out by way a sys-tematic approach, taking into consideration the definition of inadmissibility from a pro-cessual point of view and the nature and legal features of the opposition act.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
